Bollywood actress Triptii Dimri is once again making headlines, this time over reports about the significant increase in her remuneration following the success of Animal.
According to multiple media reports, Dimri was reportedly paid around ₹40 lakh for her role in Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s 2023 film Animal. The amount, however, was never officially confirmed by the actress or the film’s makers.
Following the attention she received after Animal, Dimri’s reported remuneration has increased substantially. Reports published around her casting in Spirit, directed by Sandeep Reddy Vanga and starring Prabhas, claimed that she could be receiving approximately ₹4 crore for the project. The reported figure has not been officially confirmed.
The reported difference between ₹40 lakh and ₹4 crore represents a substantial rise in the figures being reported about her film fees. However, the exact percentage increase should be treated cautiously because both amounts are based on media reports rather than official disclosures.
Dimri officially joined Spirit as the female lead opposite Prabhas in May 2025. Director Sandeep Reddy Vanga confirmed her inclusion in the project after reports surrounding the casting of the film.
Reports about the actress’s remuneration have varied. Some later reports placed her Spirit fee in the ₹4–6 crore range, further highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the exact figure.
Dimri’s career trajectory has attracted considerable attention since Animal, where she played Zoya alongside Ranbir Kapoor. Reports at the time put her remuneration for the film at around ₹40 lakh, although the figure was not officially verified.
With Spirit, Dimri is set to share the screen with Prabhas in a major pan-India production. The film is directed by Vanga, whose previous works include Arjun Reddy, Kabir Singh and Animal.
The ₹4 crore figure is a reported remuneration, not an officially confirmed payment. Likewise, the ₹40 lakh figure associated with Animal comes from media reports. Therefore, claims that her salary has definitively increased by “900%” should be presented as a reported calculation, rather than an officially established fact.